Reviews, Reputation & Revenue: The Case of Yelp

Executive Summary: In just six years, Yelp.com has managed to crowdsource 20 million reviews of restaurants and other services by creating and leveraging an impressive social network of people who enjoy writing reviews. But can a bunch of amateur opinionators working for free really transform the restaurant industry, where heavily marketed chains and highly regarded professional critics have long had a stronghold? To answer this question, HBS professor Michael Luca combined Yelp reviews with revenues for every restaurant that operated in Seattle, WA at any point between 2003 and 2009. Applying a new method to tease out the causal effect of reviews (separate from the effect of underlying quality), the study shows that a one-star increase on Yelp leads to a 5 to 9 percent increase in revenue. Yet Yelp doesn't work for all restaurants. Chain restaurants —which already spend heavily on branding —are unaffected by changes in their Yelp ratings. This suggests that consumer reviews present a new way of learning in the Internet age, and are fast becoming a substitute for traditional forms of reputation. Key concepts include: Online consumer review websites provide more information to consumers than was previously thought to be cost-effective. By relying on user-generated content, Yelp is able to review more products than traditional media such as newspaper reviews. More than 70 percent of Seattle restaurants are on Yelp. The impact of consumer reviews depends on the existing reputation of a company or product. Consumer reviews are effective overall, but ineffective when a product has a firmly established reputation (such as a chain restaurant). Consumer reviews provide a substitute for more traditional forms of marketing. Other forms of reputation such as chain affiliation may become less influential as websites like Yelp continue to gain traction. Evidence suggests that this pattern is already emerging. Consumers rely on simple metrics such as the average rating and the number of reviews, and are more trusting of reviews that are written by "elite" reviewers (as identified by Yelp). via hbswk.hbs.edu Download HBS working paper at http://goo.gl/Qd3VZ

Executive Summary:

In just six years, Yelp.com has managed to crowdsource 20 million reviews of restaurants and other services by creating and leveraging an impressive social network of people who enjoy writing reviews. But can a bunch of amateur opinionators working for free really transform the restaurant industry, where heavily marketed chains and highly regarded professional critics have long had a stronghold? To answer this question, HBS professor Michael Luca combined Yelp reviews with revenues for every restaurant that operated in Seattle, WA at any point between 2003 and 2009. Applying a new method to tease out the causal effect of reviews (separate from the effect of underlying quality), the study shows that a one-star increase on Yelp leads to a 5 to 9 percent increase in revenue. Yet Yelp doesn't work for all restaurants. Chain restaurants —which already spend heavily on branding —are unaffected by changes in their Yelp ratings. This suggests that consumer reviews present a new way of learning in the Internet age, and are fast becoming a substitute for traditional forms of reputation. Key concepts include:

  • Online consumer review websites provide more information to consumers than was previously thought to be cost-effective. By relying on user-generated content, Yelp is able to review more products than traditional media such as newspaper reviews. More than 70 percent of Seattle restaurants are on Yelp.
  • The impact of consumer reviews depends on the existing reputation of a company or product. Consumer reviews are effective overall, but ineffective when a product has a firmly established reputation (such as a chain restaurant).
  • Consumer reviews provide a substitute for more traditional forms of marketing. Other forms of reputation such as chain affiliation may become less influential as websites like Yelp continue to gain traction. Evidence suggests that this pattern is already emerging.
  • Consumers rely on simple metrics such as the average rating and the number of reviews, and are more trusting of reviews that are written by "elite" reviewers (as identified by Yelp).

Download HBS working paper at http://goo.gl/Qd3VZ